Thursday, July 31, 2014

Presentation Night Reflection Questions and Answers


1. Using the three levels of inquiry framework (Structured, Guided, and Student-Initiated), characterize how inquiry was facilitated in the activity. Identify specific aspects of the activity that demonstrate the level.

We structured the activity in a way that was engaging, activating prior knowledge and then hooking/engaging the students with a video clip. Then we continued structuring when we demonstrated what happens to a nail (iron) as it was being pulled into the magnetic field, the magnets force pulled it in (observed by a student). Then we guided the students, having them lead us to an inquiry question, writing their responses and choosing the one we had the materials and lesson guided to. 
Finally we let the students go on their own, create their own procedures, and preform the experiment. This was still guided as me and my partner continued to monitor student progress, give feedback, continue to question where they were going, what they were thinking (and why) and finally we came back together to compare our data and explain our results. 

2. What aspects of the activity were most surprising to you as a facilitator? What made these experiences surprising?
The most surprising part was that the data was so inconclusive. We found this was probably due to letting students write their own procedures and next time we may continue to guide this closely and make sure the whole group is following the same procedures next time. 

3. What aspects of facilitating the activity were most challenging or difficult, and why?
The most challenging part of the activity, for myself, was trying not to talk too much, give leading information and feed the students with information.. I remembered to hold my tongue and was thoughtful to the questioning suggestions as in the handouts we have received in class and models shown from Dr. Nelson.

4. What interactions seemed to demonstrate student learning most clearly for you, and why? 
I could tell students were learning when they were discussing that they needed to consistently put the nail toward the magnet (in the same direction) as they were asking questions like "What if we moved the nail this way, or quickly vs. slowly toward the magnet?" I could also tell they were understanding what the question was as they were writing their procedures which aligned to measuring and collecting data that was applicable to our investigation. In one case a pair of students wanted to measure data in a way that may not have been aligned to the rest of the class and the data we were collected, so we redirected these students reminding them of the inquiry question, clearing up any misunderstandings.

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Inquiry Activity..

For your blog post, please identify the NGSS Performance Expectations, Disciplinary Core Ideas, CrossCutting Concepts, and Science and Engineering Practices that are relevant to your Inquiry Activity.

Identify the NGSS Performance Expectations: 
Forces and Interactions
Students who demonstrate understanding can:
Ask questions to determine cause and effect relationships of electric or magnetic interactions between two objects not in contact with each other

Disciplinary Core Ideas
PS2.A: Forces and Motion
  • Each force acts on one particular object and has both strength and a direction. An object at rest typically has multiple forces acting on it, but they add to give zero net force on the object. Forces that do not sum to zero can cause changes in the object’s speed or direction of motion. (Boundary: Qualitative and conceptual, but not quantitative addition of forces are used at this level.) (3-PS2-1)
  • The patterns of an object’s motion in various situations can be observed and measured; when that past motion exhibits a regular pattern, future motion can be predicted from it. (Boundary: Technical terms, such as magnitude, velocity, momentum, and vector quantity, are not introduced at this level, but the concept that some quantities need both size and direction to be described is developed.) (3-PS2-2)
  • PS2.B: Types of Interactions
Objects in contact exert forces on each other. (3-PS2-1)
Electric and magnetic forces between a pair of objects
do not require that the objects be in contact. The sizes of the forces in each situation depend on the properties of the objects and their distances apart and, for forces between two magnets, on their orientation relative to each other. (3-PS2-3),(3-PS2-4)
Cross Cutting Concepts
Patterns
Patterns of change can be used to make predictions. (3-PS2-2)
Cause and Effect
Cause and effect relationships are routinely identified. (3-PS2-1)
Cause and effect relationships are routinely identified, tested, and used to explain change. (3-PS2-3
Connections to Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science
Interdependence of Science, Engineering, and Technology
Scientific discoveries about the natural world can often lead to new and improved technologies, which are developed through the engineering design process. (3-PS2-4)
Science and Engineering Practices that are relevant

Asking questions and defining problems in grades 3–5 builds on grades K–2 experiences and progresses to specifying qualitative relationships.
Ask questions that can be investigated based on patterns such as cause and effect relationships. (3-PS2-3)
Define a simple problem that can be solved through the development of a new or improved object or tool. (3-PS2-4)

Planning and Carrying Out Investigations
Planning and carrying out investigations to answer questions or test solutions to problems in 3–5 builds on K–2 experiences and progresses to include investigations that control variables and provide evidence to support explanations or design solutions.
Plan and conduct an investigation collaboratively to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence, using fair tests in which variables are controlled and the number of trials considered. (3-PS2-1)
Make observations and/or measurements to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence for an explanation of a phenomenon or test a design solution. (3-PS2-2)

Tuesday, July 29, 2014

Don't take anything personally..


I am a teacher. I am not a "science" teacher, or an "art" teacher, or a "reading" teacher, or a "Math" teacher, or a "history" teacher, or a "writing" teacher or a "PE" teacher. 

I am ALL of these.


I am taking a Teachers that want to teach Science course through Fresno State, mainly to better myself, learn more, add credits to my growing list of post graduate credits for a raise, and of course in return improve my teaching practices.


 I am learning quite a bit. 


My first year teaching I had the opportunity to attend the ACSI conference in Sacramento. 


It was amazing. We had 3 days of workshops, classes, worship time, fellowship and even some really neat entertainment in the evening one night. We also got to walk around Old Town Sacramento, visit the capital and I was with some great friends/teachers, it was like a family vacation. The hardest part was leaving my husband and  5 month old baby girl and having the complications of being a distant breastfeeding mother. If you have ever breastfed and left your children you know what I mean. Thank GOD for my breast pump and a freezer in the hotel room.  

EVEN greater of a memory than all of that uncomfortableness was in one workshop the speaker said 

"You must teach with InTENtionality." 


I'm reading some really good books this summer. This one is great: 


There are so many qualities that a Master Teacher posses, but the top seven in this book (and I will quote directly) are: 

"1. Master teachers start where their students are.
2. Master teachers know where their students are going.
3. Master teachers expect to her their students to their goal.
4. Master teachers support their students along the way.
5. Master teachers use feedback to help them and their students get better.
6. Master teachers focus on quality rather than quantity.
7. Master teachers never work harder than their students." (Jackson, 4)


Some of these I think I am gifted in, others I am not. using feedback to help myself get better is a challenge. I tend to take things personally, which according to the Four Agreements by Miguel Ruiz (a great reading!) one should never take things personally. 




This is hard to do with my personality, my insecurities and my background. I work hard for praise, I am a wonderful student because school was the only place I excelled, felt valued and felt love. This is why I am a teacher today. I want to give back. 



Monday, July 28, 2014

I was busy observing and interacting with the Earth and real life Science... so, I haven't done my homework

I had a lot of fun this last weekend relaxing, reading, starting fires (in a forest, but I was safe!), fishing, sitting by the lake, playing games and dolls with Claire, taking 2 long hikes, exploring this glorious Earth and viewing the stars all made by the one and only God above. 
I've never seen the water this low!


Claire caught a trout... Seeing the joy on her face,... that was the best part of the weekend!
She shared her fish, but I think that's the most fish I've ever seen her eat at one time.




My partner and I haven't had a lot of time (NONE) to discuss what we will be doing for our inquiry activity...
We are going to have our students most likely measure the power of a magnet. I think a fun idea would be to place a 3 magnets 2 cm's from one magnet to see if it would pull the other towards it. Then lead students in a way of questioning that perhaps they want to know if they put 2 magnets 2 cm's away would it pull the other towards it? Would keeping the distance of the magnets, but adding more (or taking less magnets away) and then measuring the number of magnets that may be attracted be fun? Or keeping the number of magnets the same, but changing the distance change how many magnets they could attract?


Thursday, July 24, 2014

Let's jump off the swings!

There was a time my 4th grade teacher bribed my class with "recess". His name was Mr Reiss, he really liked Reece's, the candy, as did I. The problem here was very clear to me. When he said we would get a free "recess" I naturally assumed we would be enjoying a delicious candy. My mind was already so focused on chocolate, that I ignored the clear diction differences.


You can imagine my disappointment when he let us all go out to play with no candy on hand.
Be careful that your children and/or students are clear on the expectations you have; rewards and discipline that may be given.
This was not his mistake at all, but a tragic tale from my childhood that reminds me, as an adult, teacher, human, partner, mom, (and whatever else I am) to be clear, and make sure to clear up any misconceptions that may or may not be anticipated.

One of the best ways to do this is to model exactly what is hoped for. Like me dreaming of Reese's. I would have been awoke to reality had someone asked if we were free to jump from the swings, wait, what does that have to do with chocolate!? Oh he means "recess!"  Of course. Playing time without the evil yard duty yelling at us to stay out of puddles even though we weren't going that way, duh.




Some of my students love jumping off of the swings. One problem with this is that I actually also love this pass time, but I am  not allowed to model to them the safe ways to land, instead they get a bad note from the office and they continue to jump in an unsafe way.


Wouldn't it be awesome if I "structured" my lesson in a way that I modeled what might happen to a swing when it is jumped from? 
Next, let's have the students talk about a few things that might change our jumping and landing. This would be "guided". Let's talk about if Jim, a 120 pound 3rd grader jumps off, how is this different from 60 pound Cassy? What if they jumped when the swing was 10 feet from the ground? Give me more ideas, students. What other independent variables can we change to see what happens to our body as it lands?  How far can we go? Oh we can land in some  water the deep end of a pool? A field? A bowl of Jello?? Great ideas. 

Now let your kids go outside, jump off swings at different heights, measure their landing distance. Let the students initiate their own inquiry. Give them time for procedures, determining independent variables, dependent and constants. One group breaks an arm of leg!? Awesome! How far did they land? Record that on a data chart.  It may be necessary to have an EMT available, or just a good ol' school nurse, or some kind of first responder. 

My husband is trained as a first responder.
So tomorrow if Claire is in a cast it could be for the love of science. She'll be ok. Bones heal. 


This was way more interesting than measuring how many times a boring old pendulum swings back and forth for 30 seconds, when additional weight is added, instead let's jump off of swings.

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Do I want to be looking at this?

Inquiry investigations... pretty much a research/science project with a fancy name.
What do we need and how should it be graded... here's my take on this.

1. What is the question? What are the scientists measuring or trying to figure out? Is the question clear? Yes or no?

2. Are the independent, dependent and constants are clearly labeled? Yes or no... easy.

3. Background information on the topic. Give us some key concepts and terms. Do the researchers give some information so that regular people will know what is being researched. Yes  or No  credit or no credit

4. Are there some props and data and graphs and some other fun things? Is there effective communication? Make it clear.   Do I want to be looking at this? Yes or No?

It should probably look about this good... this is what I want to be looking at.



5. What are the procedures these people followed? Were you safe? Written out, yes or no?

6. What happened? Was it was you predicted? Interpret the findings, do this and you get credit, or else nothing.

7. Refer to the real scientists, what do they say about this same topic. Do this and you can get a yes : )
8. How can they make their experiment better? Give us a few ideas about how you messed up and you won't next time. Credit/no credit.

Total of 8/8 I am sure is what we will all get, because we've been working hard.



I think I definitely am working hard... As I type up my presentation at the dentist office, juggle a 4 year old, VBS volunteering, homework, swim lessons, daily chores, driving, eating.. you know, life..... Wish me luck...

Tuesday, July 22, 2014

The RISE of the EGG


There is this teaching method in science called the 5E learning cycle... pretty much 5 words that all start with... you guessed it...the Letter E! I feel like I am back on Sesame street, today's letter is the letter E!

The first stage of the 5E is 'Engagement': we watched a video of people floating in a salty lake and a bowling ball that also was floating. That was engaging.

The second stage of the 5E is Exploration. We discussed what we would need to do to make an egg float in water. My partner and I wrote out procedures and filled in a table with information. We were questioned by our professor throughout our writing of procedures and while we were working on throwing an egg in some regular water.. then salty water, then some really salty water. ('Evaluation')
 400 Milliliters of water and 3 Tablespoons of salt later, we had a floating egg.  I kept randomly shouting "THE RISE of the EGG!" because I thought it was funny, my partner laughed (perhaps sympathetically), but she's a good sport. 



Next, we were to 'Explain' what we thought the density of an egg is. We have no idea what the density of the egg is, however we had an idea of the density of our water 400 grams of water 51 grams of salt, divided by 400 milliliters of water and we were at around 1.125 or something about that. So we know the egg must be less dense than the water. This is the part where the professor narrowed in his questioning to get us to focus, it wasn't how many T's of salt or how many Mils of water, but what was the density of the egg.. and unknown... He put a table up on the smart board and we filled in the table, that was another way he was 'Evaluating' our understandings and he was able to clarify misunderstandings. 

The E 'Evaluating' goes throughout the lesson, evaluating is fluid and never ends...

The final E is 'extending or elaboration'.We discussed as a whole group about how we could make our experiment better, ways we could test more accurately. I won't be doing this, it is not homework and I am too busy...

This week is crazy busy, sometimes I wonder why I do these things to myself. I think for the challenge of it all...